Swire Consulting Group
Investor-calibrated diagnostic
Fundable by Swire Consulting Group

See why investors hesitate

What to change, and what builds conviction before your next meeting

Built from live investor advisory work, Fundable turns founder materials into stage-specific conviction gaps, narrative rewrite priorities, and clear execution steps based on how real investors make decisions.

Baseline assessment first. Full diagnostic available for companies that need deeper work before or during a live raise.

Quick self-diagnosis

You likely have a fundability issue if:

  • You've had 5+ investor conversations with no term sheet.
  • Feedback is positive, but nothing progresses.
  • Your valuation is consistently challenged.
  • You are being told to "come back with more proof".
  • Your raise size, use of funds, or structure keeps shifting.

If 2 or more apply

Your raise is probably not being interpreted the way you think it is.

What baseline often surfaces

Primary drag

Narrative-investor mismatch

Typical stage

Seed to Series A

Likely result

Meetings without commitment

First correction

Tighten proof, fit, and use of funds

Conviction gaps

See exactly where investor confidence breaks across proof, fit, and raise logic.

Narrative rewrite priorities

Prioritised changes for the deck, memo, and fundraising story before the next meetings.

Stage-specific interpretation

Understand how seed, Series A, and specialist investors read the same evidence differently.

Immediate next actions

Leave with the 3–5 actions most likely to rebuild conviction before live conversations.

What Fundable is

An investor-calibrated diagnostic of conviction.

Fundable assesses your opportunity using the same filters investors apply internally: category clarity, differentiation, scalability narrative, revenue quality, capital efficiency, investor fit, and risk translation.

This is not a pitch review. It answers a harder question:

“Would a rational investor commit capital, now?”

Sample output

Clear, decision-grade output.

Category clarity Differentiation Scalability Investor fit Risk translation Capital efficiency

Illustrative diagnosis

Investable, but not converting

Likely outcome

Interest without conviction

Founder feedback

Feedback from founders who have used Fundable.

“The distinction around positioning Shoveltech as a transaction infrastructure layer vs workflow software strongly resonated. The emphasis on maturity delta and GCC expansion provided clear direction on refining our narrative and investor positioning.”

Harshad Bhojane, CEO, Shoveltech Solutions Pvt Ltd

★★★★★ Feedback collected by Trustpilot
“This feels like a complete investor playbook. It brings real alignment and efficiency to the fundraising process, but what stood out most was the thoughtful market and investor context behind the recommendations. The round design and valuation framing were especially useful, and the report gives a very strong strategic overview. It’s something I expect to refer back to repeatedly before engaging investors.”

Anuj Chandalia, Founder & CEO, Manentia AI

★★★★★ Feedback collected by Trustpilot

What you receive

More than a score. A view of how capital actually sees you.

Each assessment is built to surface where investor conviction is likely to strengthen, stall, or break. That includes the questions investors are likely to raise, the peer set you may be pulled into, the capital types that are realistically available, and the actions most likely to improve outcomes.

Fundability score

A structured score across the dimensions most likely to affect conversion.

Investor objection mapping

The exact questions likely to arise in investment committee discussions.

Capital strategy reality

What capital is actually available, and from whom.

Priority actions

What needs to change to materially improve outcomes before further outreach.

Why raises fail

In practice, the issue is rarely access.

Most founders believe they need more introductions, a sharper deck, or a better market. Across live raises, the pattern is more consistent than that: the business may be viable, but the investment case does not yet meet conviction thresholds.

Typical impact

3-6 months

added to fundraising timelines

Valuation pressure

20-35%

potential valuation reduction

Capital quality

Lower conviction

investor mix when the story is weak

Observed patterns from live raises

USD 10M expansion raise, manufacturer

Perceived issue: wrong investors. Actual issue: weak articulation of commercial reality and competition in target markets. Outcome: narrative corrected; investor meetings materialised.

USD 8M debt raise, agricultural infrastructure

Perceived issue: lenders not engaging. Actual issue: debt was structurally unworkable because assets, revenues and financing need sat in separate entities. Outcome: company restructured; facilities secured.

USD 5M equity raise, healthcare expansion

Perceived issue: valuation pushback. Actual issue: risk did not match valuation and the team had expertise gaps. Outcome: round reduced, specialist expertise added, term sheet followed shortly after.

Series A, drone manufacturer

Perceived issue: crowded market. Actual issue: weak articulation of niche, valuation, and use of funds. Outcome: repositioned, round resized, term sheet secured.

Why this is more than AI

AI can improve the story. It cannot judge whether the story converts.

Founders can now use AI tools to improve wording, deck structure, and even financial modelling. That is useful, but it does not solve the core problem. Raises stall because investors are making judgement calls about risk, comparability, round design, team credibility, and the likelihood of a real capital outcome.

That requires calibration: repeated exposure to how investors actually behave in live situations, not just how businesses sound on paper.

AI vs Fundable

AI tools
Fundable
Improves narrative and wording
Helps structure financial materials
Judges whether investors will commit capital
No
Identifies where conviction breaks in practice
No
Grounded in real fundraising pattern recognition
No

Who it is for

Best used at two moments.

Before investor outreach

To ensure your positioning, structure, and use of funds are strong enough to convert efficiently.

During a stalled raise

After 5-10 conversations without progression, when interest exists but conviction is not building.

How it works

A funnel designed for qualified leads first.

01

Baseline assessment

Complete the structured intake. This creates an initial diagnostic and signals whether deeper work is warranted.

02

Review and triage

We identify the main issues likely to affect investor conversion and determine the right next step.

03

Full Fundable diagnostic

For companies that need more, we produce a deeper investor-alignment report and practical repositioning recommendations.

Typical scope for the full diagnostic

Usually USD 2,500-6,500 depending on stage, complexity, and the level of materials reviewed.

Why Swire Consulting

Grounded in live capital raises and direct investor interaction.

Fundable is grounded in more than 100 fundraising situations across multiple sectors and markets. It is designed to reflect how investors think, where discussions stall, and what usually needs to change before capital can move.

This is not theoretical. It is built from observed deal behaviour across the UK, India, the Middle East, Europe, and the United States.

Cross-border focus

30+ countries

Client work

300+ clients

Financial benefits

USD 450M+

Before you lose time, momentum, or valuation

Understand how investors actually see your opportunity.

Start with the baseline assessment. If deeper work is needed, we can help you move from an interesting story to a fundable one.